Accessibility

Last updated

The short version

We want SlipAway to work for everyone, including people using a screen reader, a keyboard alone, magnification, or reduced motion. This page covers both the website and the iOS app. It says what we have actually checked, what we know is imperfect, and how to tell us when something does not work.

What we aim for

We aim to meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA on the website, and Apple’s accessibility guidance in the app. We describe both as partially conformant: much of the standard is met, neither has had a full independent audit, and we are not claiming more than we can show.

What we have checked on this website

What we know is imperfect on the website

Listing these is the point of the page. If we only listed what works, this would be marketing rather than an accessibility statement.

The SlipAway app

The app is built with SwiftUI and inherits a great deal from iOS itself. The specifics below come from reviewing our own code, not from a formal audit.

What works

What is imperfect

Telling us about a problem

If any part of the site or the app is difficult or impossible to use, please tell us — a specific report (“the call screen’s End button is unlabelled in VoiceOver”) helps far more than a general one, but send whatever you have.

support@slipawayapp.com

We aim to reply within five working days. If we cannot fix something quickly, we will tell you what the workaround is and when we expect a proper fix.

How this statement was prepared

Prepared on 31 July 2026 by self-evaluation, covering both surfaces: a review of this site’s markup and styles against WCAG 2.1 Level AA, and a review of the iOS app’s source for Dynamic Type, VoiceOver labelling, reduced motion, and appearance handling.

Two problems found on the website during that review — missing visible focus indicators, and form fields relying on placeholder text instead of labels — were fixed before this page was published, rather than listed here as known issues. The app issues above are listed rather than fixed because they need design decisions and real testing, not a one-line change, and we would rather publish them than wait.